Embarking on a lock-out

September 20, 2021 by admin
views

  • In the matter of South African Commercial Catering and Allied Workers Union (SACCAWU) obo Member vs Southern Sun Hotel Interests (Pty) Ltd [2021], the Labour Court handed down a judgment concerning the institution of a lock-out by an employer against employees for their refusal to reach an agreement indemnifying the employer against its failure to implement a wage increase as per the collective agreement.
  • In this case, Southern Sun had commenced a lock-out action against its employees following their refusal to agree to a wage increase for the period of 1 April 2020 to 31 March 2021 to not be carried out, as per a collective agreement signed on 13 March 2020.
  • Southern Suns argument stemmed from the COVID-19 pandemic. In light of the hospitality industry being so heavily impacted, the wage increase of 5.5% as initially agreed upon in terms of the collective agreement could not be effected throughout the period of 2020.
  • This had resulted in a notice of termination of the collective agreement between Southern Sun and SACCAWU, with the indication from Southern Sun that no further collective agreements would be entered/re-entered into come 31 March 2021.
  • Southern Sun then issued its employees with a demand in the form of a “non-implementation” agreement.
  • SACCAWU on behalf of its members had subsequently rejected this demand, with the matter then being referred to the CCMA by Southern Sun.
  • In light of the matter failing to reach consensus after 30 days, Southern Sun had issued a 48- hour notice of a lock-out on 27 July 2021, effected 30 July 2021.
  • The Court held that “the respondent [Southern Sun] has indeed complied with the requisite process as set out in section 64 of the Labour Relations Act (LRA). This should ordinarily form the basis for a lock-out to be protected. With the collective agreement in place for the period of the increase forming the subject matter of the lock-out, the very lock-out certainly lost protection in view of section 65(3)(a)(i) limitations.”
  • Section 65(3)(a)(i) of the LRA provides that “subject to a collective agreement, no person may take part in a strike or a lock-out or in any conduct in contemplation or furtherance of a strike or lockout if that person is bound by any arbitration award or collective agreement that regulates the issue in dispute.

Key learning: –

In order to avoid an unprotected lock-out, employers should be mindful of the extent of collective agreements which they conclude.

Relevant Resources More

3rd Annual CCMA Shop Stewards and Union Officials Conference 2019

3rd Annual CCMA Shop Stewards and Union Officials Conference 2019

3rd Annual CCMA Shop Stewards and Union Officials Conference 2019